Why doesn’t Quduopai pay? Revealing recent hot topics and platform controversies
Recently, the short video platform "Quduopai" has become the focus of heated discussions on the Internet due to user withdrawal issues. Many creators reported that they were unable to cash out their earnings, and the platform’s customer service responded slowly, triggering widespread doubts. This article will combine the hot topic data of the entire network in the past 10 days to analyze the reasons behind this incident and sort out the relevant structured information.
1. Overview of hot topic data on the entire network in the past 10 days
| Ranking | hot topics | Number of discussions (10,000) | Main platform |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | It’s difficult to withdraw cash from Quduopai | 45.6 | Weibo, Douyin |
| 2 | AI painting copyright dispute | 32.1 | Zhihu, Bilibili |
| 3 | Tesla price cut controversy | 28.7 | Toutiao, Little Red Book |
| 4 | ChatGPT-4o released | 25.3 | WeChat, Twitter |
2. Core Issues in the Quduopai Withdrawal Controversy
1.Withdrawal rules are not transparent: Users reported that the platform frequently changes the withdrawal threshold, such as changing from “withdrawal over 10 yuan” to “withdrawal over 100 yuan” without prior notice.
2.Missing customer service response: Most complaints pointed out that after submitting a withdrawal application, customer service channels (emails, online conversations) have not responded for a long time.
3.Suspicious funds chain: Some industry insiders speculate that the platform may have tight cash flow due to high operating costs or financing difficulties.
| Complaint channels | Number of complaints (last 10 days) | Resolution rate |
|---|---|---|
| black cat complaint | 1,287 items | 12% |
| 12315 platform | 563 items | 8% |
3. User response suggestions and industry warnings
1.Keep evidence: Screenshots of withdrawal rules, income details and customer service communication records for rights protection purposes.
2.Complaints through multiple channels: Submit issues through official channels such as 12315 and the Cyberspace Administration of China to speed up the processing process.
3.Be wary of “high-yield” propaganda: Some emerging platforms attract users through high subsidies, but their sustainability is questionable and they need to be chosen carefully.
4. Summary
The Quduopai incident reflects the loopholes in fund management of some Internet platforms. Users need to increase their risk awareness, and the industry should also strengthen supervision to avoid the spread of similar problems. In the future, platform transparency and user rights protection will become key factors in competition.
(The full text is about 850 words in total)
check the details
check the details
en
